<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1974 (10) TMI 12 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39100</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the reconstituted partnership firm was a new assessable entity distinct from the old firm. It affirmed the right of the new firm to choose its accounting period and upheld separate assessments for the old and new firm&#039;s income. The court ruled in favor of the assessee, granting costs of the reference.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Oct 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 18:23:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=77646" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1974 (10) TMI 12 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39100</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the reconstituted partnership firm was a new assessable entity distinct from the old firm. It affirmed the right of the new firm to choose its accounting period and upheld separate assessments for the old and new firm&#039;s income. The court ruled in favor of the assessee, granting costs of the reference.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Oct 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39100</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>