https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761060 In a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act prosecution, the High Court will not quash summoning or revisional orders where the complaint, supporting documents, and affidavit disclose a prima facie case and the subordinate courts have passed reasoned orders without jurisdictional error. Disputed objections about service of notice, whether the cheques arose from different transactions, and whether a joint trial was proper are factual matters for trial, not for interference at the summoning stage. The material also supported joint trial under Section 223 CrPC, while separate notices under Section 251 CrPC protected the accused's rights. Interference under supervisory or inherent jurisdiction was therefore unwarranted. en-us Fri, 18 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 04 Nov 2024 14:26:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761060 In a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act prosecution, the High Court will not quash summoning or revisional orders where the complaint, supporting documents, and affidavit disclose a prima facie case and the subordinate courts have passed reasoned orders without jurisdictional error. Disputed objections about service of notice, whether the cheques arose from different transactions, and whether a joint trial was proper are factual matters for trial, not for interference at the summoning stage. The material also supported joint trial under Section 223 CrPC, while separate notices under Section 251 CrPC protected the accused's rights. Interference under supervisory or inherent jurisdiction was therefore unwarranted. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 18 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761060