https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458509 A minimum eco-sensitive zone of one kilometre was prescribed around protected forests generally, while Jamua Ramgarh Wildlife Sanctuary was treated as a special case with a 500-metre zone for subsisting activities and one kilometre for new activities. Mining within national parks and wildlife sanctuaries was prohibited, and only pre-existing non-prohibited activities within the eco-sensitive zone could continue subject to forest authority control and the applicable protected-area restrictions. The proceedings were treated as having an in rem environmental character, so persons directly affected by the proposed directions could seek participation; impleadment was allowed for specified applicants and refused for the remaining applicants identified in the order. en-us Fri, 03 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Nov 2024 07:35:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458509 A minimum eco-sensitive zone of one kilometre was prescribed around protected forests generally, while Jamua Ramgarh Wildlife Sanctuary was treated as a special case with a 500-metre zone for subsisting activities and one kilometre for new activities. Mining within national parks and wildlife sanctuaries was prohibited, and only pre-existing non-prohibited activities within the eco-sensitive zone could continue subject to forest authority control and the applicable protected-area restrictions. The proceedings were treated as having an in rem environmental character, so persons directly affected by the proposed directions could seek participation; impleadment was allowed for specified applicants and refused for the remaining applicants identified in the order. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 03 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458509