<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (1) TMI 27 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39090</link>
    <description>Complaints under the Income-tax Act against directors and an alleged principal officer should not be quashed at the threshold where the allegations disclose a prima facie offence; whether the individuals were principal officers, agents, or otherwise responsible for the company&#039;s affairs is a question to be tested on evidence. The court also noted that a prosecution barred by limitation can be quashed where the defect is apparent on the face of the record. The article therefore states that status-based objections generally do not defeat process at the pleading stage, but limitation remains a separate ground for interference where clearly established.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 14:27:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=77636" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (1) TMI 27 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39090</link>
      <description>Complaints under the Income-tax Act against directors and an alleged principal officer should not be quashed at the threshold where the allegations disclose a prima facie offence; whether the individuals were principal officers, agents, or otherwise responsible for the company&#039;s affairs is a question to be tested on evidence. The court also noted that a prosecution barred by limitation can be quashed where the defect is apparent on the face of the record. The article therefore states that status-based objections generally do not defeat process at the pleading stage, but limitation remains a separate ground for interference where clearly established.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39090</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>