<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Advance Money Investment: Tax Benefit Confirmed for NHAI Bonds.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82745</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal held that the assessee is eligible to claim deduction u/s 54EC of the Income Tax Act for investment in bonds of the National Highway Authority of India (NHAI). The assessee had invested the advance money received towards the sale of a property in the specified NHAI bonds before the date of transfer. This is in line with Circular No. 359 and the Bombay High Court&#039;s decision in CIT vs. Subhash Vinayak Supnekar, which ruled that when an advance received under an agreement to sell a capital asset is invested in specified bonds, the benefit of Section 54EC is available. The Tribunal observed a direct nexus between the advance received and the investment made, thereby allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Nov 2024 08:12:52 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Nov 2024 08:12:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=776358" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Advance Money Investment: Tax Benefit Confirmed for NHAI Bonds.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82745</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal held that the assessee is eligible to claim deduction u/s 54EC of the Income Tax Act for investment in bonds of the National Highway Authority of India (NHAI). The assessee had invested the advance money received towards the sale of a property in the specified NHAI bonds before the date of transfer. This is in line with Circular No. 359 and the Bombay High Court&#039;s decision in CIT vs. Subhash Vinayak Supnekar, which ruled that when an advance received under an agreement to sell a capital asset is invested in specified bonds, the benefit of Section 54EC is available. The Tribunal observed a direct nexus between the advance received and the investment made, thereby allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Nov 2024 08:12:52 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82745</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>