https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761019 CESTAT New Delhi dismissed the appeal filed by the appellant. The appellant's counsel misunderstood the Commissioner (Appeals) order, incorrectly believing the matter was remanded to the original authority. The Commissioner (Appeals) had actually upheld the order-in-original and rejected the appeal, while noting that if service tax was already deposited through challans, it could be adjusted against the demand. The tribunal found the Commissioner (Appeals) order correct and proper, requiring no interference, and confirmed the appeal's dismissal. en-us Tue, 29 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 30 Oct 2024 10:14:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761019 CESTAT New Delhi dismissed the appeal filed by the appellant. The appellant's counsel misunderstood the Commissioner (Appeals) order, incorrectly believing the matter was remanded to the original authority. The Commissioner (Appeals) had actually upheld the order-in-original and rejected the appeal, while noting that if service tax was already deposited through challans, it could be adjusted against the demand. The tribunal found the Commissioner (Appeals) order correct and proper, requiring no interference, and confirmed the appeal's dismissal. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 29 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761019