https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761020 CESTAT Mumbai allowed the appeal and set aside the order denying CENVAT credit benefit under notification 30/2004-CE. The appellant had cleared final products under exemption notification but revenue denied benefit claiming credit was taken on inputs used for exempted finished products. CESTAT held that since duty liability was discharged on intermediate products, credit entitlement could not be denied. The disputed credit had been reversed by appellant, and following precedent from Allahabad HC in Hello Mineral Water case, the tribunal found no sustainable grounds for continuing detriment to appellants. en-us Tue, 29 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 04 Nov 2024 08:12:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761020 CESTAT Mumbai allowed the appeal and set aside the order denying CENVAT credit benefit under notification 30/2004-CE. The appellant had cleared final products under exemption notification but revenue denied benefit claiming credit was taken on inputs used for exempted finished products. CESTAT held that since duty liability was discharged on intermediate products, credit entitlement could not be denied. The disputed credit had been reversed by appellant, and following precedent from Allahabad HC in Hello Mineral Water case, the tribunal found no sustainable grounds for continuing detriment to appellants. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 29 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761020