<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 13 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761027</link>
    <description>An adjudicatory order may be procedurally defective where the member who decides the matter was not the officer who heard the affected party, raising a breach of natural justice. The text also highlights uncertainty in applying the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 where lessees had made payments and the treatment of refund and appropriation remained unclear. In that setting, the matter required reconsideration on merits after clarification of how such payments should be handled under the scheme.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2024 15:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=776333" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 13 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761027</link>
      <description>An adjudicatory order may be procedurally defective where the member who decides the matter was not the officer who heard the affected party, raising a breach of natural justice. The text also highlights uncertainty in applying the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 where lessees had made payments and the treatment of refund and appropriation remained unclear. In that setting, the matter required reconsideration on merits after clarification of how such payments should be handled under the scheme.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761027</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>