<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 14 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761028</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court set aside the orders refusing bail after noting that a co-accused had already been granted bail and that the complaint had been filed. It held that the earlier condition related only to interim bail and clarified that the trial court could impose appropriate conditions while granting bail. Bail was therefore granted to the appellant, subject to terms and conditions to the satisfaction of the trial court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Nov 2024 08:12:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=776332" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 14 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761028</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court set aside the orders refusing bail after noting that a co-accused had already been granted bail and that the complaint had been filed. It held that the earlier condition related only to interim bail and clarified that the trial court could impose appropriate conditions while granting bail. Bail was therefore granted to the appellant, subject to terms and conditions to the satisfaction of the trial court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761028</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>