<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 19 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761033</link>
    <description>CESTAT New Delhi upheld rejection of self-assessed value of imported aluminium scrap by Deputy Commissioner, finding reasonable doubt existed regarding declared transaction value based on objective considerations. However, CESTAT remitted matter back to Deputy Commissioner for proper re-determination of value under appropriate valuation rules, as the original re-assessment lacked adequate reasoning and Commissioner (Appeals) failed to examine whether rule 5 or rule 9 of Valuation Rules should apply for enhanced value determination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2024 14:21:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=776327" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 19 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761033</link>
      <description>CESTAT New Delhi upheld rejection of self-assessed value of imported aluminium scrap by Deputy Commissioner, finding reasonable doubt existed regarding declared transaction value based on objective considerations. However, CESTAT remitted matter back to Deputy Commissioner for proper re-determination of value under appropriate valuation rules, as the original re-assessment lacked adequate reasoning and Commissioner (Appeals) failed to examine whether rule 5 or rule 9 of Valuation Rules should apply for enhanced value determination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761033</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>