<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1974 (8) TMI 10 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39086</link>
    <description>Scope of the Explanation concerning penalty for inaccurate income returns: the statutory presumption of concealment arises only where returned income is less than eighty per cent of the assessed income after reducing for bona fide expenditure incurred for earning income but disallowed as deduction; consequence: law deems concealment unless the assessee adduces evidence to show failure to return correct income was not due to fraud, gross or wilful neglect. The burden to rebut this presumption rests on the assessee, and the assessing authority must consider whether disallowed bona fide expenditure affected the eighty per cent comparison before imposing penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Aug 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2026 16:54:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=77632" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1974 (8) TMI 10 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39086</link>
      <description>Scope of the Explanation concerning penalty for inaccurate income returns: the statutory presumption of concealment arises only where returned income is less than eighty per cent of the assessed income after reducing for bona fide expenditure incurred for earning income but disallowed as deduction; consequence: law deems concealment unless the assessee adduces evidence to show failure to return correct income was not due to fraud, gross or wilful neglect. The burden to rebut this presumption rests on the assessee, and the assessing authority must consider whether disallowed bona fide expenditure affected the eighty per cent comparison before imposing penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Aug 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39086</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>