<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 28 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761042</link>
    <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal concerning the addition under section 69A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Assessing Officer&#039;s decision to add unexplained cash deposits to the assessee&#039;s income was modified. The ITAT directed that 15% of the total addition be considered business income, deleting the remainder, due to the absence of new evidence and the age of the assessment year. The decision was pronounced on 29th October 2024 in Chennai.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Nov 2024 08:12:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=776318" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 28 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761042</link>
      <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal concerning the addition under section 69A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Assessing Officer&#039;s decision to add unexplained cash deposits to the assessee&#039;s income was modified. The ITAT directed that 15% of the total addition be considered business income, deleting the remainder, due to the absence of new evidence and the age of the assessment year. The decision was pronounced on 29th October 2024 in Chennai.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761042</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>