<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 37 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761051</link>
    <description>An administrative or quasi-judicial order affecting rights must record clear reasons in the order itself; a later affidavit cannot cure the defect. A non-speaking rejection of a request to extend export time beyond 90 days was therefore unsustainable because it did not disclose why the request was refused, defeating fairness, transparency, and effective judicial review. The unreasoned rejection was quashed and the matter remanded for a fresh reasoned decision in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2025 15:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=776309" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 37 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761051</link>
      <description>An administrative or quasi-judicial order affecting rights must record clear reasons in the order itself; a later affidavit cannot cure the defect. A non-speaking rejection of a request to extend export time beyond 90 days was therefore unsustainable because it did not disclose why the request was refused, defeating fairness, transparency, and effective judicial review. The unreasoned rejection was quashed and the matter remanded for a fresh reasoned decision in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761051</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>