<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 1407 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458494</link>
    <description>The Bombay HC adjourned the group of GST writ petitions to 7 January 2021 after the State stated that the Advocate General would appear for it. Until then, the Court directed that status quo as on the date of the order be maintained. The order also permitted circulation of a digitally signed copy by e-mail for compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 03 Nov 2024 17:48:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=776296" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 1407 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458494</link>
      <description>The Bombay HC adjourned the group of GST writ petitions to 7 January 2021 after the State stated that the Advocate General would appear for it. Until then, the Court directed that status quo as on the date of the order be maintained. The order also permitted circulation of a digitally signed copy by e-mail for compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458494</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>