<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 1534 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458495</link>
    <description>The Bombay HC permitted the State to complete the assessment for 2018-2019 before it became time-barred, but directed that any effect of that assessment would not be enforced and would remain subject to the final outcome of the pending writ petition. The Court also recorded the assessee&#039;s complaint that limited time may affect its ability to present its case, and directed that the opportunity-to-be-heard issue be considered when the writ petition is heard.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2025 14:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=776295" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 1534 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458495</link>
      <description>The Bombay HC permitted the State to complete the assessment for 2018-2019 before it became time-barred, but directed that any effect of that assessment would not be enforced and would remain subject to the final outcome of the pending writ petition. The Court also recorded the assessee&#039;s complaint that limited time may affect its ability to present its case, and directed that the opportunity-to-be-heard issue be considered when the writ petition is heard.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458495</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>