https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458484 A status quo order in contempt proceedings was construed as prohibiting disturbance of the existing position on possession, title and construction over the land. The Court held that parties could seek governmental permissions or approvals, but those steps did not permit alteration of the subject matter during the pendency of the petition. Exercising inherent powers, the Court said it could issue consequential protective directions to prevent continuation of an alleged violation and preserve the property. It therefore directed that the respondents not undertake development, transfer title, or part with possession of the land pending the petition. en-us Mon, 15 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 30 Oct 2024 15:02:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458484 A status quo order in contempt proceedings was construed as prohibiting disturbance of the existing position on possession, title and construction over the land. The Court held that parties could seek governmental permissions or approvals, but those steps did not permit alteration of the subject matter during the pendency of the petition. Exercising inherent powers, the Court said it could issue consequential protective directions to prevent continuation of an alleged violation and preserve the property. It therefore directed that the respondents not undertake development, transfer title, or part with possession of the land pending the petition. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 15 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458484