<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1974 (9) TMI 13 - PATNA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39080</link>
    <description>The court quashed the orders of the Income-tax Officer and the Additional Commissioner of Income-tax, directing the Income-tax Officer to allow the petitioner to rectify the defect by certifying the copy of the partnership deed and then dispose of the registration application accordingly. The court also quashed the related writ application orders, allowing both writ applications without any order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 13:47:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=77626" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1974 (9) TMI 13 - PATNA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39080</link>
      <description>The court quashed the orders of the Income-tax Officer and the Additional Commissioner of Income-tax, directing the Income-tax Officer to allow the petitioner to rectify the defect by certifying the copy of the partnership deed and then dispose of the registration application accordingly. The court also quashed the related writ application orders, allowing both writ applications without any order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39080</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>