<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 1303 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458482</link>
    <description>The Official Liquidator substantiated a company debt through the company&#039;s ledger account and supporting demand communications, and the respondent, having been served but filing no defence, failed to rebut the claim. On that documentary record, the Court accepted proof of liability and permitted recovery of the established debt with interest. The claim for Rs. 1,00,000 was allowed, together with interest at 6% per annum from the date of application until realisation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2024 11:52:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=776259" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 1303 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458482</link>
      <description>The Official Liquidator substantiated a company debt through the company&#039;s ledger account and supporting demand communications, and the respondent, having been served but filing no defence, failed to rebut the claim. On that documentary record, the Court accepted proof of liability and permitted recovery of the established debt with interest. The claim for Rs. 1,00,000 was allowed, together with interest at 6% per annum from the date of application until realisation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458482</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>