<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Rejecting CBDT circular&#039;s time limit, Court allows late compounding of tax offences for non-habitual offenders.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82715</link>
    <description>Rejection of a compounding application filed beyond the prescribed time limit as per the CBDT circular. The High Court held that the CBDT cannot issue a circular contrary to the object of the provisions, and fixing a time limit for filing a compounding application is not permissible u/s 279(2) of the Income Tax Act. The Court ruled that once an offence is compoundable by law, its compoundability cannot be restricted by imposing a time limit. The impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remanded to the respondent to consider the compounding application on record, as the petitioner was not a habitual offender.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2024 08:32:36 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2024 08:32:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=776231" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Rejecting CBDT circular&#039;s time limit, Court allows late compounding of tax offences for non-habitual offenders.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82715</link>
      <description>Rejection of a compounding application filed beyond the prescribed time limit as per the CBDT circular. The High Court held that the CBDT cannot issue a circular contrary to the object of the provisions, and fixing a time limit for filing a compounding application is not permissible u/s 279(2) of the Income Tax Act. The Court ruled that once an offence is compoundable by law, its compoundability cannot be restricted by imposing a time limit. The impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remanded to the respondent to consider the compounding application on record, as the petitioner was not a habitual offender.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2024 08:32:36 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82715</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>