<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 1535 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760936</link>
    <description>A tendering authority may reject even the lowest financial bid where the tender conditions reserve that power and permit rejection for past unsatisfactory performance. Judicial review in contractual tender matters is limited to the decision-making process and will not extend to substituting the court&#039;s view unless the process is arbitrary, unreasonable, mala fide, discriminatory, or contrary to the tender terms. On adverse reports regarding past performance and non-compliance with statutory dues, the authority&#039;s refusal to accept the bid was treated as consistent with the RFP, and no interference was warranted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2024 08:32:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=776210" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 1535 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760936</link>
      <description>A tendering authority may reject even the lowest financial bid where the tender conditions reserve that power and permit rejection for past unsatisfactory performance. Judicial review in contractual tender matters is limited to the decision-making process and will not extend to substituting the court&#039;s view unless the process is arbitrary, unreasonable, mala fide, discriminatory, or contrary to the tender terms. On adverse reports regarding past performance and non-compliance with statutory dues, the authority&#039;s refusal to accept the bid was treated as consistent with the RFP, and no interference was warranted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760936</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>