https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760943 Bombay HC dismissed appeal concerning Rule 6 of CENVAT Credit Rules 2004. The court held that automobile cess and education cess constitute excise duties, not separate levies. Following precedent in M/s Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd, the court ruled that goods/services on which such cesses are paid cannot be regarded as exempted goods/services under Rule 6. The CESTAT's order was upheld, finding no substantial questions of law arose in the appeal. en-us Fri, 25 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 29 Oct 2024 13:07:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760943 Bombay HC dismissed appeal concerning Rule 6 of CENVAT Credit Rules 2004. The court held that automobile cess and education cess constitute excise duties, not separate levies. Following precedent in M/s Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd, the court ruled that goods/services on which such cesses are paid cannot be regarded as exempted goods/services under Rule 6. The CESTAT's order was upheld, finding no substantial questions of law arose in the appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 25 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760943