<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 1543 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760944</link>
    <description>A special leave petition was dismissed because there was a 282-day delay in filing and the condonation application did not disclose any plausible explanation for the delay. The Court found the reasons offered insufficient and declined to entertain the petition on that ground, leaving the merits unexamined.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2024 08:32:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=776202" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 1543 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760944</link>
      <description>A special leave petition was dismissed because there was a 282-day delay in filing and the condonation application did not disclose any plausible explanation for the delay. The Court found the reasons offered insufficient and declined to entertain the petition on that ground, leaving the merits unexamined.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760944</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>