https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760957 A writ petition under Article 226 challenging an ongoing anti-dumping investigation and the inclusion of the importer's product in the product under consideration was treated as premature. The Court held that, where the statutory investigation under Rules 4, 5 and 6 of the Anti-Dumping Rules was still in progress, interference on the disputed scope determination would prejudice the process. It therefore declined to examine the merits of the product scope objection and refused interference at the investigation stage. en-us Tue, 22 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 30 Oct 2024 08:32:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760957 A writ petition under Article 226 challenging an ongoing anti-dumping investigation and the inclusion of the importer's product in the product under consideration was treated as premature. The Court held that, where the statutory investigation under Rules 4, 5 and 6 of the Anti-Dumping Rules was still in progress, interference on the disputed scope determination would prejudice the process. It therefore declined to examine the merits of the product scope objection and refused interference at the investigation stage. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 22 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760957