https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760992 Article 226 interference was declined against the GST assessment because the record showed the petitioner had been heard at the intimation stage, responded to the show cause notice, filed a written synopsis, and received a personal hearing. The Court found no material indicating that the petitioner's submissions were ignored or that principles of natural justice were breached. In those circumstances, discretionary writ jurisdiction was not warranted, and the petitioner was left to pursue the statutory remedy. en-us Mon, 18 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 May 2025 18:24:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760992 Article 226 interference was declined against the GST assessment because the record showed the petitioner had been heard at the intimation stage, responded to the show cause notice, filed a written synopsis, and received a personal hearing. The Court found no material indicating that the petitioner's submissions were ignored or that principles of natural justice were breached. In those circumstances, discretionary writ jurisdiction was not warranted, and the petitioner was left to pursue the statutory remedy. Case-Laws GST Mon, 18 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760992