<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 1601 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761002</link>
    <description>Suspension of registration led to blocking of input tax credit, and the court permitted the taxpayer to seek administrative redress by making a representation for unblocking before the concerned authority. The authority was directed to consider and decide that representation in accordance with law within two weeks, leaving the merits of the credit claim to the statutory process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2024 13:21:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=776144" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 1601 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761002</link>
      <description>Suspension of registration led to blocking of input tax credit, and the court permitted the taxpayer to seek administrative redress by making a representation for unblocking before the concerned authority. The authority was directed to consider and decide that representation in accordance with law within two weeks, leaving the merits of the credit claim to the statutory process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761002</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>