<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 1605 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761006</link>
    <description>An order based on the mistaken finding that no reply to the show-cause notice had been filed could not stand where the portal record showed the reply was received but not considered. That non-consideration denied the petitioner a fair opportunity of hearing and breached the principles of natural justice, so the impugned order was set aside. The authority was directed to consider the reply and proceed from that stage in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 May 2025 17:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=776140" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 1605 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761006</link>
      <description>An order based on the mistaken finding that no reply to the show-cause notice had been filed could not stand where the portal record showed the reply was received but not considered. That non-consideration denied the petitioner a fair opportunity of hearing and breached the principles of natural justice, so the impugned order was set aside. The authority was directed to consider the reply and proceed from that stage in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761006</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>