<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1942 (3) TMI 20 - FEDERAL COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458470</link>
    <description>A provincial legislative entry covering intoxicating liquors and narcotic drugs was construed broadly enough to support prohibition by notification, because the words on production, manufacture, possession, transport, purchase and sale were illustrative and not restrictive. A constitutional limit on laws affecting import and export of goods did not invalidate the measure, because that restriction applied to trade-and-commerce entries, not to legislation grounded in the separate intoxicating liquors and narcotic drugs entry. Previous sanction was also unnecessary, since the earlier excise enactment was not a Governor-General&#039;s Act in the relevant constitutional sense. The amending legislation was therefore upheld, and the conviction under the notification sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 1942 00:00:00 +0630</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2024 16:18:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=776103" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1942 (3) TMI 20 - FEDERAL COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458470</link>
      <description>A provincial legislative entry covering intoxicating liquors and narcotic drugs was construed broadly enough to support prohibition by notification, because the words on production, manufacture, possession, transport, purchase and sale were illustrative and not restrictive. A constitutional limit on laws affecting import and export of goods did not invalidate the measure, because that restriction applied to trade-and-commerce entries, not to legislation grounded in the separate intoxicating liquors and narcotic drugs entry. Previous sanction was also unnecessary, since the earlier excise enactment was not a Governor-General&#039;s Act in the relevant constitutional sense. The amending legislation was therefore upheld, and the conviction under the notification sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 1942 00:00:00 +0630</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458470</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>