https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458464 Article 227 supervisory jurisdiction is to be exercised sparingly and ordinarily does not justify interference with concurrent findings absent jurisdictional error or patent illegality. Section 22(1) of SICA suspends specified proceedings such as winding up, execution, distress, receiver appointment, and certain recovery or enforcement actions, but a landlord's suit for possession or eviction is not covered by that bar. The commentary also notes that the statutory protection was not established on the pleaded facts, including any showing that the premises formed part of a BIFR scheme or that the relevant plea had been taken in the written statement. en-us Mon, 16 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 29 Oct 2024 10:52:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458464 Article 227 supervisory jurisdiction is to be exercised sparingly and ordinarily does not justify interference with concurrent findings absent jurisdictional error or patent illegality. Section 22(1) of SICA suspends specified proceedings such as winding up, execution, distress, receiver appointment, and certain recovery or enforcement actions, but a landlord's suit for possession or eviction is not covered by that bar. The commentary also notes that the statutory protection was not established on the pleaded facts, including any showing that the premises formed part of a BIFR scheme or that the relevant plea had been taken in the written statement. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 16 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458464