https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760856 At the pre-trial stage, complaints under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act were not quashed because the authorised representative's personal knowledge and authority were prima facie asserted in the complaint and pre-summoning affidavit. The challenge to the power of attorney and the alleged compromise deed raised disputed questions of fact and law that could not be conclusively decided in proceedings under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The earlier quashing of proceedings concerning a different cheque did not control the present complaints, as the authorisation here was stated to be duly attested and the earlier defect was matter-specific. The complaints and the notice under Section 251 were therefore left to proceed to trial. en-us Mon, 21 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 28 Oct 2024 16:28:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760856 At the pre-trial stage, complaints under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act were not quashed because the authorised representative's personal knowledge and authority were prima facie asserted in the complaint and pre-summoning affidavit. The challenge to the power of attorney and the alleged compromise deed raised disputed questions of fact and law that could not be conclusively decided in proceedings under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The earlier quashing of proceedings concerning a different cheque did not control the present complaints, as the authorisation here was stated to be duly attested and the earlier defect was matter-specific. The complaints and the notice under Section 251 were therefore left to proceed to trial. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 21 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760856