<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 1460 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760861</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order by the Commissioner (Appeals) and reinstating the refund sanction by the Assistant Commissioner. The Tribunal clarified that even without explicit mention of the 25% penalty reduction in its order, compliance with payment conditions entitles the appellant to the reduced penalty. The decision was pronounced in open court on 28/10/2024.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2024 09:00:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=776051" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 1460 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760861</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order by the Commissioner (Appeals) and reinstating the refund sanction by the Assistant Commissioner. The Tribunal clarified that even without explicit mention of the 25% penalty reduction in its order, compliance with payment conditions entitles the appellant to the reduced penalty. The decision was pronounced in open court on 28/10/2024.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760861</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>