<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 1466 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760867</link>
    <description>NCLAT dismissed appeal challenging resolution plan approval involving wrongful allocation of Rs. 79 lakhs as liquidation value. Following SC precedent in Amit Metaliks Limited, tribunal held that Committee of Creditors&#039; commercial wisdom in approving resolution plans should not be interfered with unless creditors of similar class are denied fair treatment. Court rejected appellant&#039;s claim for liquidation value payment as dissenting financial creditor, upholding tribunal&#039;s decision based on established jurisprudence regarding Section 30(4)(2) and Section 53 considerations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Oct 2024 11:14:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=776045" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 1466 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760867</link>
      <description>NCLAT dismissed appeal challenging resolution plan approval involving wrongful allocation of Rs. 79 lakhs as liquidation value. Following SC precedent in Amit Metaliks Limited, tribunal held that Committee of Creditors&#039; commercial wisdom in approving resolution plans should not be interfered with unless creditors of similar class are denied fair treatment. Court rejected appellant&#039;s claim for liquidation value payment as dissenting financial creditor, upholding tribunal&#039;s decision based on established jurisprudence regarding Section 30(4)(2) and Section 53 considerations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760867</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>