https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760868 NCLAT dismissed appeal applying res judicata principle. Appellant filed second information against same parties on identical facts after first information was declined by CCI. Previous proceedings established that Department of Expenditure is not an enterprise under Section 2(h) of Competition Act, 2002, and Office Memorandum is not an agreement under Section 3. SC precedent confirmed DOE cannot be considered enterprise regarding OM dated 24.03.2006. Court held legal maxim nemo debet lis vexari pro una et eadem causa applies, preventing vexation twice for same adjudicated cause. en-us Fri, 25 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 26 Oct 2024 13:00:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760868 NCLAT dismissed appeal applying res judicata principle. Appellant filed second information against same parties on identical facts after first information was declined by CCI. Previous proceedings established that Department of Expenditure is not an enterprise under Section 2(h) of Competition Act, 2002, and Office Memorandum is not an agreement under Section 3. SC precedent confirmed DOE cannot be considered enterprise regarding OM dated 24.03.2006. Court held legal maxim nemo debet lis vexari pro una et eadem causa applies, preventing vexation twice for same adjudicated cause. Case-Laws Law of Competition Fri, 25 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760868