<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 1470 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760871</link>
    <description>The Bombay HC dismissed the Writ Petition, underscoring the necessity of adhering to statutory remedies and pre-deposit requirements for appeals under the Customs Act, 1962. The Court ruled that issues, such as denial of cross-examination, should be addressed through the appellate process, not directly via a Writ Petition, keeping all contentions open for future consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2024 09:00:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=776041" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 1470 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760871</link>
      <description>The Bombay HC dismissed the Writ Petition, underscoring the necessity of adhering to statutory remedies and pre-deposit requirements for appeals under the Customs Act, 1962. The Court ruled that issues, such as denial of cross-examination, should be addressed through the appellate process, not directly via a Writ Petition, keeping all contentions open for future consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760871</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>