<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 1476 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760877</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, overturning the Ld CIT(A)&#039;s decision to uphold the addition of gross profit on alleged bogus purchases. The Tribunal found that the assessee provided sufficient documentation, including purchase bills and payments via Account Payee cheques, with no evidence of funds being cycled back. Consequently, the Tribunal directed the AO to delete the addition, aligning with a similar precedent set by the Hon&#039;ble Supreme Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2024 09:00:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=776035" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 1476 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760877</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, overturning the Ld CIT(A)&#039;s decision to uphold the addition of gross profit on alleged bogus purchases. The Tribunal found that the assessee provided sufficient documentation, including purchase bills and payments via Account Payee cheques, with no evidence of funds being cycled back. Consequently, the Tribunal directed the AO to delete the addition, aligning with a similar precedent set by the Hon&#039;ble Supreme Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760877</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>