<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 1482 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760883</link>
    <description>The HC allowed the Writ Petition, quashing the Impugned Notice and Order under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, due to a change of opinion and issuance beyond the four-year limitation period. It held that the Petitioner had disclosed all necessary information during the original assessment, thus invalidating the reopening under Section 147. Consequently, the Petitioner was granted relief without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2024 09:00:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=776029" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 1482 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760883</link>
      <description>The HC allowed the Writ Petition, quashing the Impugned Notice and Order under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, due to a change of opinion and issuance beyond the four-year limitation period. It held that the Petitioner had disclosed all necessary information during the original assessment, thus invalidating the reopening under Section 147. Consequently, the Petitioner was granted relief without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760883</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>