<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 1490 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760891</link>
    <description>The SC examined a writ petition challenging a corrigendum related to tax payment terms in a tender process. The Court declined direct intervention, finding factual complexities. It directed the petitioner to pursue resolution through contractually specified dispute mechanisms, emphasizing adherence to tender document terms and conditions for addressing GST-related payment disputes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 May 2025 14:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=776021" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 1490 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760891</link>
      <description>The SC examined a writ petition challenging a corrigendum related to tax payment terms in a tender process. The Court declined direct intervention, finding factual complexities. It directed the petitioner to pursue resolution through contractually specified dispute mechanisms, emphasizing adherence to tender document terms and conditions for addressing GST-related payment disputes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760891</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>