https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760893 HC ruled that the forfeiture of Security Deposit was unjust due to non-compliance with natural justice principles. The court quashed the original order and directed the concerned party to reconsider the decision within four months, ensuring proper notice and opportunity to be heard. The ruling emphasized procedural fairness in administrative actions, referencing established legal precedents on principles of natural justice. en-us Tue, 05 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 May 2025 19:49:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760893 HC ruled that the forfeiture of Security Deposit was unjust due to non-compliance with natural justice principles. The court quashed the original order and directed the concerned party to reconsider the decision within four months, ensuring proper notice and opportunity to be heard. The ruling emphasized procedural fairness in administrative actions, referencing established legal precedents on principles of natural justice. Case-Laws GST Tue, 05 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760893