<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 1493 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760894</link>
    <description>A writ petition challenging a GST intimation on mining lease amounts was disposed of by following earlier Division Bench directions. The petitioner was permitted to file a reply to the intimation within four weeks, while the larger bench proceedings on royalty and allied GST issues remained pending. The court did not finally decide the GST liability on merits, and the petitioner&#039;s contentions were left open to be raised in appropriate proceedings after the larger bench decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 May 2025 19:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=776018" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 1493 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760894</link>
      <description>A writ petition challenging a GST intimation on mining lease amounts was disposed of by following earlier Division Bench directions. The petitioner was permitted to file a reply to the intimation within four weeks, while the larger bench proceedings on royalty and allied GST issues remained pending. The court did not finally decide the GST liability on merits, and the petitioner&#039;s contentions were left open to be raised in appropriate proceedings after the larger bench decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760894</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>