https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760898 GST liability intimated on seigniorage fee and turnover from quarrying was dealt with in line with earlier Division Bench directions, with the petitioner allowed to file a reply to the intimation within four weeks. The court directed that the GST issue relating to quarrying turnover should thereafter proceed in accordance with law, and disposed of the writ petition on the same terms as the prior order. en-us Tue, 12 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 May 2025 19:23:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760898 GST liability intimated on seigniorage fee and turnover from quarrying was dealt with in line with earlier Division Bench directions, with the petitioner allowed to file a reply to the intimation within four weeks. The court directed that the GST issue relating to quarrying turnover should thereafter proceed in accordance with law, and disposed of the writ petition on the same terms as the prior order. Case-Laws GST Tue, 12 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760898