https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760908 In GST assessment proceedings, the court noted that intimation, show cause notice, and multiple hearing opportunities had already been issued, and that a registered person was expected to monitor the portal. As the taxpayer had not effectively participated or placed objections on record, the court nevertheless granted one further opportunity to contest the demand. The assessment orders were quashed and the matter was remitted to the assessing officer, subject to the taxpayer remitting 10% of the disputed tax demand for each assessment period, filing a reply, and being given a fresh hearing before new orders are passed. en-us Mon, 18 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 May 2025 18:26:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760908 In GST assessment proceedings, the court noted that intimation, show cause notice, and multiple hearing opportunities had already been issued, and that a registered person was expected to monitor the portal. As the taxpayer had not effectively participated or placed objections on record, the court nevertheless granted one further opportunity to contest the demand. The assessment orders were quashed and the matter was remitted to the assessing officer, subject to the taxpayer remitting 10% of the disputed tax demand for each assessment period, filing a reply, and being given a fresh hearing before new orders are passed. Case-Laws GST Mon, 18 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760908