<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 1508 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760909</link>
    <description>A challenge to a GST assessment order based only on the claim that the reply to the show cause notice was not considered was held insufficient to invoke Article 226. The HC found that, where an alternate statutory remedy is available under the GST framework, such a grievance does not justify entertaining a writ petition. The petition was therefore treated as untenable and dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 May 2025 18:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=776003" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 1508 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760909</link>
      <description>A challenge to a GST assessment order based only on the claim that the reply to the show cause notice was not considered was held insufficient to invoke Article 226. The HC found that, where an alternate statutory remedy is available under the GST framework, such a grievance does not justify entertaining a writ petition. The petition was therefore treated as untenable and dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760909</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>