<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 1509 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760910</link>
    <description>A pending application for cancellation of GST registration, which had earlier been rejected and then refiled, was directed to be disposed of within four weeks. The Court did not examine the merits of either application and confined its intervention to requiring a timely decision by the respondent. The petition was therefore disposed of on the limited ground of expedition, without any adjudication on the substantive cancellation issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 May 2025 18:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=776002" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 1509 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760910</link>
      <description>A pending application for cancellation of GST registration, which had earlier been rejected and then refiled, was directed to be disposed of within four weeks. The Court did not examine the merits of either application and confined its intervention to requiring a timely decision by the respondent. The petition was therefore disposed of on the limited ground of expedition, without any adjudication on the substantive cancellation issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760910</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>