<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 1526 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760927</link>
    <description>GST assessment based on balance sheet figures was held unsustainable where the order did not clearly explain the basis for taxing total trade payables and employee benefit expenses. The record also reflected a challenge that the show cause notice had not been served and that no personal hearing was granted. On those facts, the assessment required fresh consideration with a reasonable opportunity to respond. The impugned order was quashed and the matter remanded for reconsideration after reply and personal hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 May 2025 18:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=775985" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 1526 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760927</link>
      <description>GST assessment based on balance sheet figures was held unsustainable where the order did not clearly explain the basis for taxing total trade payables and employee benefit expenses. The record also reflected a challenge that the show cause notice had not been served and that no personal hearing was granted. On those facts, the assessment required fresh consideration with a reasonable opportunity to respond. The impugned order was quashed and the matter remanded for reconsideration after reply and personal hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760927</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>