https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760928 The Madras High Court considered whether an appeal filed after the ordinary limitation period and the condonable period could still be entertained where the requisite pre-deposit had been remitted online. On the facts, the Court found it to permit the appeal to be received and decided on merits, subject to satisfaction that the 10% pre-deposit had been made. The rejection of the appeal on limitation was set aside, and the appellate authority was directed to dispose of the appeal on merits. en-us Wed, 27 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 May 2025 18:04:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760928 The Madras High Court considered whether an appeal filed after the ordinary limitation period and the condonable period could still be entertained where the requisite pre-deposit had been remitted online. On the facts, the Court found it to permit the appeal to be received and decided on merits, subject to satisfaction that the 10% pre-deposit had been made. The rejection of the appeal on limitation was set aside, and the appellate authority was directed to dispose of the appeal on merits. Case-Laws GST Wed, 27 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760928