https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458450 Where a specialised statute vests dispute resolution in the regulator and the complaint process has already begun, a writ of mandamus to compel or hasten adjudication is premature and will not ordinarily lie. The Court noted that the regulator had issued notice and was already considering the complaint, so no basis existed for alleging indefinite delay. It also declined interim restraint against the disputed payment arrangement or coercive steps, as the contractual and commercial issues were still arguable and required determination by the competent statutory fora. The writ petition was therefore treated as premature, with the merits left to the designated regulators and forums. en-us Fri, 05 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 28 Oct 2024 21:59:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458450 Where a specialised statute vests dispute resolution in the regulator and the complaint process has already begun, a writ of mandamus to compel or hasten adjudication is premature and will not ordinarily lie. The Court noted that the regulator had issued notice and was already considering the complaint, so no basis existed for alleging indefinite delay. It also declined interim restraint against the disputed payment arrangement or coercive steps, as the contractual and commercial issues were still arguable and required determination by the competent statutory fora. The writ petition was therefore treated as premature, with the merits left to the designated regulators and forums. Case-Laws Law of Competition Fri, 05 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458450