<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 1451 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458459</link>
    <description>A bank may classify a borrower as a wilful defaulter only on its own objective satisfaction, formed from the borrower&#039;s overall track record and material showing intentional, deliberate default. A forensic audit report may corroborate suspicion but cannot replace the bank&#039;s independent determination under the Master Circular. Here, the show cause notice was issued primarily on the basis of the forensic report without the required recorded assessment, and the transactions relied on had earlier been disclosed and treated as strategic investments rather than diversion of funds. The confirmation of wilful defaulter status was therefore quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2024 11:25:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=775964" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 1451 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458459</link>
      <description>A bank may classify a borrower as a wilful defaulter only on its own objective satisfaction, formed from the borrower&#039;s overall track record and material showing intentional, deliberate default. A forensic audit report may corroborate suspicion but cannot replace the bank&#039;s independent determination under the Master Circular. Here, the show cause notice was issued primarily on the basis of the forensic report without the required recorded assessment, and the transactions relied on had earlier been disclosed and treated as strategic investments rather than diversion of funds. The confirmation of wilful defaulter status was therefore quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458459</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>