<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Distinction between obiter dictum and ratio decidendi</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/manuals?id=5682</link>
    <description>The binding legal rule is the ratio decidendi - the principle found by reading a judgment in light of the questions actually before the court; observations unnecessary to the decision are obiter dictum, non-binding though persuasive. Courts should not treat isolated phrases, factual findings, or concessions as binding law, and subordinate courts must follow principles declared by the apex court on points properly decided.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2024 16:59:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2025 18:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=775947" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Distinction between obiter dictum and ratio decidendi</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/manuals?id=5682</link>
      <description>The binding legal rule is the ratio decidendi - the principle found by reading a judgment in light of the questions actually before the court; observations unnecessary to the decision are obiter dictum, non-binding though persuasive. Courts should not treat isolated phrases, factual findings, or concessions as binding law, and subordinate courts must follow principles declared by the apex court on points properly decided.</description>
      <category>Manuals</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2024 16:59:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/manuals?id=5682</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>