https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458446 The HC dismissed the writ petition challenging SEBI's and SAT's decisions, finding no evidence of bias, misconduct, or conspiracy. It emphasized that SEBI's Chairman had appropriately recused himself, and the decision-making was independent. The court underscored that public interest litigation must not be misused and ordered the petitioner to pay costs, reinforcing the importance of protecting judicial integrity and institutional processes. en-us Wed, 29 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 28 Oct 2024 16:56:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458446 The HC dismissed the writ petition challenging SEBI's and SAT's decisions, finding no evidence of bias, misconduct, or conspiracy. It emphasized that SEBI's Chairman had appropriately recused himself, and the decision-making was independent. The court underscored that public interest litigation must not be misused and ordered the petitioner to pay costs, reinforcing the importance of protecting judicial integrity and institutional processes. Case-Laws SEBI Wed, 29 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458446