https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458443 The SC accepted the recommendations from the Justice K.T. Thomas and F.S. Nariman Committees, emphasizing legislative amendments to the PDPP Act and guidelines for police and state governments to prevent property destruction during protests. The Court underscored the importance of media self-regulation and established a framework to balance legal accountability, media freedom, and public order. The judgment reflects a comprehensive strategy to address challenges posed by agitations, including leader liability, evidence collection through videography, and the connection between tort and crime. The Court's decision aims to prevent future incidents and maintain public order during demonstrations. en-us Thu, 16 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 28 Oct 2024 11:45:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458443 The SC accepted the recommendations from the Justice K.T. Thomas and F.S. Nariman Committees, emphasizing legislative amendments to the PDPP Act and guidelines for police and state governments to prevent property destruction during protests. The Court underscored the importance of media self-regulation and established a framework to balance legal accountability, media freedom, and public order. The judgment reflects a comprehensive strategy to address challenges posed by agitations, including leader liability, evidence collection through videography, and the connection between tort and crime. The Court's decision aims to prevent future incidents and maintain public order during demonstrations. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 16 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458443