<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (6) TMI 30 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39046</link>
    <description>A proposed dividend does not become a known or contingent liability before shareholder approval in general meeting, because the obligation to pay dividend is prospective and does not relate back to the first day of the accounting year. On that basis, the amount set aside for a later dividend declaration could not be treated as a provision or deducted from general reserves when computing capital under the Surtax Act, 1964. The analysis distinguished cases involving existing reserve items or already sanctioned reserves, which were not applicable where only a dividend recommendation existed and no amount had been set apart as a dividend reserve.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 12:02:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=77592" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (6) TMI 30 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39046</link>
      <description>A proposed dividend does not become a known or contingent liability before shareholder approval in general meeting, because the obligation to pay dividend is prospective and does not relate back to the first day of the accounting year. On that basis, the amount set aside for a later dividend declaration could not be treated as a provision or deducted from general reserves when computing capital under the Surtax Act, 1964. The analysis distinguished cases involving existing reserve items or already sanctioned reserves, which were not applicable where only a dividend recommendation existed and no amount had been set apart as a dividend reserve.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39046</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>